Here is my take on the recent ban. To be clear I am talking about the Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorists Entry Into The United States.
I read it and I call Bullshit.
But here is my take anyhow. This is the only way I can make sense of this.
If I wanted to get into some sort of negotiation with somebody or an organization, I would most likely figure out what my bottom line is, start with an opening stance or bid and wait for the counter bid. I would use my skills of knowing the market and the product, the service and the customers, to get to what I would consider a fair value, price or trade. I would be able to stand my ground and if the deal was not what I wanted, I would walk.
If I was at an auction and wanted livestock, equipment or land, I would do my homework and know who the seller is before the object came up for bid. I would weigh the value of the product against the actual cost and again set a bottom line. A line that I would not go over even if that Ram, or tractor or parcel of land was the sweetest thing since sugar on snow.
If I was less ethical and believed that “by what ever means necessary” was the way to get stuff done, I might even make the environment less stable by creating a distraction to then close the deal. I would prey on people’s emotional responses and underlying human characteristics and use emotion to help achieve my goals. I would manipulate the environment.
If I were Trump and I made a whole bunch of outrageous promises that played to a particular group of people, and by some fluke I actually won the Presidency, what better way to get what I want.. power.. by operating the government like a business. I would have a game plan that includes a bigger picture.
By distracting the nation with his egregious executive commands, he is playing a shell game . Of course this executive ban is going to be legally challenged, because it is illegal.
Even I know that the United States constitution protects religious freedoms, including showing preference for one particular religious group. I am referring to section 5 (b). ” to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality.”
Well, perhaps we should start right here at home first. I digress.
The point is this. If I wanted to make a power grab that is outside of the constitution; such as rolling back environmental regulations to help oil companies expand their private business, thought the use of eminent domain (it is coming watch out), or perhaps reverse the laws around marriage equality, or racial equality or even deny health care for women, those with mental illness or addictions, then I might throw a diversion. Kinda like a cluster bomb.
I might just do something so outlandish that everyone is distracted.
Then nobody will press for full tax and business disclosures. No one will worry about what was said to Putin in the call the other day. We will be so split and emotionally scattered that a reasonable response will be hard to muster.
He test drove his strategy when he flooded twitter with inauguration twats and then sent his press secretary and Kellyanne out to spin dry the “alternative facts” line. And guess what. It worked. This behavior is so unpresidential, that it is stunning. However this behavior can be seen with other demagogues. It is seen with people whose moral compass is unable to find true north.
The thing is, you gotta step away from the center of the emotional response and take a look. Look for the bigger picture.
I don’t know what he and his cabinet are up to. I have been reading up on him though and what I read about him is scary. He is human, like the rest of us and he is bright. Very savvy when it comes to business. The biggest problem is that he sees the country as a business and not a democracy. He understands it as a demagoguery and that is the critical difference. Perhaps he is hastening his own tyranny, meaning that he will be replaced by Pence. Perhaps the leading party is going to let him continue. But while this unfolds, we must come together. March and protest but also come together to work this democracy as it is laid out.
Therefore, if we as a nation are to uphold the principles of this great democracy, we must step back and think about his in terms of a marathon, not a short distance sprint. We must not get caught in the distractions, but come together to shut this thing down.